It totally went against what we knew of physics. Nobody wanted to admit that a perfectly spherical world with constant illumination and rotation could generate weather. Nobody wants his carefully-researched theory noted in textbooks as "a useful first approximation" or to carry, even if only in his own head, the stigma of your life's work being derived from "second-class" measurements. It threatens the importance of their own discoveries. Sagan has noted several times that the "old guard" often hampers progress in science. It's also incredibly arrogant to claim that something that would contradict existing science is impossible it's tantamount to claiming that we already know all that can be known, in which case science can just pack it in, we don't need you guys any more, don't forget your hat. These would probably be the spiritual descendants of the "scientists" who claimed that traveling at greater than 60 MPH would cause the blood to boil and was therefore impossible. It goes against what we know about the physical Universe and is therefore impossible, they say." "However, most scientists believe that such anti-gravity research is fundamentally flawed. Some so-called "scientists" need a refresher course in Laboratory Science 101: It really is mind-boggling if you start thinking about it. not as a physicist but as a sysadmin and astronomy student, but I never, with all the math and physics have learned, heard a single answer to those questions, not even to the one of WHY THINGS CAN MOVE. Is a particle of matter really some kind of knot in the topology of time and space? Since particle have mass, do they have a Schwarzschild radius, and do they have some kind of quantum black hole inside? Are they constantly tunneling through their own quantum black hole maybe: a topological entity of some kind? And nobody really knows what exactly IS movement, and kinetic energy, and what really happens with matter if it moves and its kinetic energy is transformed in another kind of energy. Since the reason there IS gravity, and mass, is not understood (it just IS) and why objects are in one place and not suddenly somewhere else. Now it would be wonderful if using some setup with superconductors, spinning or otherwise, could supress inertia, or mass, or gravity or whatever. So, looking into more exotic an less understood stuff like effects of superconductivity might bring surprises like Podkletnovs experiments. If there isn't such a connection, there cannot be a GUT. If there is a unified grand theory, and gravity, electroweak, weak and strong nuclear forces can be traced back to any fundamental force, that means there is some connection between gravity and electromagnetism.
The claim was that anything ABOVE the disk lost 2% weight, not the disk itself.įurthermore: the idea is not so crazy.
Achieving an effect as large as 2% of the weight of that disc is quite a feat if done by 'gravitation effects' it's by far more probable to stem from electromagnetic effects, especially in an experiment with rotating superconductors. Is there positive gravitational charge? What is that? But there IS negative gravity via negative pressure, the effect of dark energy.the cosmological uld such repulsive gravity be harnessed to offset positive gravitational attraction? never thought of that!!! Brian Greene has a one liner to that effect in FABRIC OF THE COSMOS: to the effect that negative pressure and repulsive gravity overcomes the attractive gravity of mass and energy at cosmological distances.all we would need is an amplifier!! (just joking.> - gravity is a very weak force, the only reason its so 'strong' here is that big ball of mud below our feet. How does superposition relate to shielding? Now that I think about it I don't know exactly how shielding works. Another important difference is that there appears to be no negative gravitational charge. One very important difference between the equations are that Maxwell's equations are linear and therefore obey the principle of superposition (this is how most shielding actually happens) while the EFE are non-linear and do not allow superposition.
0 kommentar(er)
